Father-in-law denies that TUBERCULOSIS CARRIER be infected by him...DO YOU BUY THAT?

Talk about mortal in denial.
The father-in-law of Andrew Speaker, the infected TB carter, works for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta have conducted research on tuberculosis for the National Center for Infectious Diseases.
He states:
"I do not have TB, nor own I ever had TB. My son-in-law's TB did not come from myself or the CDC's labs."
How can there possibly be NO CONNECTION??
This cannot be a COINCIDENCE...why is the father-in-law surrounded by such denial?
THE STORY:
http://www.cnn.com/2007/health/condition...Father-in-law denies that TUBERCULOSIS CARRIER be infected by him...DO YOU BUY THAT?
I am sorry, but what are the odds, that someone have a rare and importantly contagious disease and his father in directive, being an expert for the CDC, didn't craft ANY attempt to stop him?? I am very suspicious of this integral story...
ehhh thats all i can utter to that
I do buy that.
He is regularly tested for TB, so if he did infect his son, he would have tested positive AND have symptoms of TB.
There can be a coincidence, many relations get TB. His be a rare strain.
There would simply be a TB cluster if this be the case-his new wife as resourcefully as others in close home or friend range would absolutely be an issue-where it is not.
A person cannot get TB home lets speak, on the sleeve of his shirt without infection as a possible issue and afterwards onto someone else.
TB happens. It's a reality of life. It is not a coincedence.